Yes, if you are coming from the game page, but not if you are coming from the homepage or something else. For example, if someone asks a good question about some variant you have to either be currently playing on that map or have to scroll down for forever.

Ctrl F, type name of Variant, done

the same can you use to find any word in almost any web

Ok... just a suggestion. Figured it would be as much of a space-saving feature as the stat page's menu.

I have a hard time navigating it as well. Often links take me to the wrong place on that page.

give the page a second to load, it's because of the images coming in.

I love the stat page...useful.

I try to avoind editing the main webdip code, so I don't have to take care of every single change once a new version is available. But I think the stats page could need some improvements. If I have some more time I'll take care of this.

just a funny observation: we need a lot of games to make the stats really valuable. out of curiosity I checked the stats of the Lepanto variant, 100% symmetric... if the stats were already significant, we should see more or less 50-50 of solos.. instead.. check yourself ;P
I'm not against the stats page, which is absolutely lovely, I just want to ask everybody to play more!! lol

and I invite the players of the HolyLeague to behave better! come on!

going on from that, look at Duo.
maybe playing red gives some kind of advantage.

*red colored countries that is

yeah I noticed the same lol

Stats are great and fun, but I wouldn't base a strategy on them. Any country can win in any kind of map.

true.. imho the stats are more useful for checking whether some variants are too biased in favor of a player, and eventually correcting the issue

I think most variants are pretty fair for everyone. It's a matter of adopting the correct strategy. For example everyone seems to think that Germany vs Russia is biased in favor of Russia, and the stats say so as well. But I have played as both Germany and Russia and think it is pretty even. The thing is that Germany needs to blitz Russia from year 1 to stand a chance.

The ones that are probably more screwed up are Turkey and France in Rinascimento. They depend on the pity of the rest of the players to stand a chance. Turkey is successful only when Napoli cds or misses some phases and France the same with Savoia.

@ alokomot: I agree about French, but not about Turkish: they can do well, specially if they form an anti-Napoli alliance, even if Napoli plays the game.

Maybe if it is not a good player, but a well played Napoli has a huge advantage over Turkey and can eliminate any Turkish threat in the first two or three years even if Venice and Stato decide to ally with Turkey. (For Venice it makes sense, but for Stato it doesn't so it probably won't happen.)

speaking of Rinascimento, I was wondering why france did not get a special home sc like spain did in dutch revolt

I think that France should have one supply center atleast, that they don't have to use support to get. that way, after year one, they can have that one PLUS the one with the Neutral in it(whatever the name is).

i mena im just saying that France has always been a major player in Europe, or at least it has for a long time, and if i was the king of france I wouldnt just send two armies and if the don't conquer something in one year give up