here's what's important:
Mon 09 PM (To: Germany, from you) - Can I count on a support into Sweden from Skag?
Tue 10 AM (To: Germany, from you) - Is that a yes?
Tue 03 PM (To: You, from Germany) - I was thinking if you invaded StP and I invaded Sweden?
Tue 03 PM (To: You, from Germany) - I can't see a way to get both though unfortunately...
Tue 03 PM (To: Germany, from you) - Yes, but you "promised" to support me into Sweden. :P
*note the tongue sticking out emoticon*
I have had only one build and I honestly have to secure a second build for fear of that French fleet heading North. If I don't have a build, I could be screwed. I feel that I must enforce my claim.
Tue 04 PM (To: You, from Germany) - I already supported you in so I'm under no obligation. Your claim, however, is reasonable.
from there the debate went public.

ummmmm. ok?

...well you can't just walk into a 4 page thread (with a game attached) and expect to understand :P

So what tt? I made clear that his interpretation was incorrect. And as he said my claim was reasonable.

The fact that the collective could not enforce in such a clear cut case demonstrates the futility of the exercise.

My request relative to Skag was to make sure that he knew I was coming from Skag and not Norway.

Oh and I'm pretty sure I called him a damn liar privately before I pressed a public case.

There are only three types of liars: liars, damn liars and statisticians.

then I think the problem was that you were not thorough enough in asking your request.
whatever past is past.

P.S. did you realize that because you added an unnecessary post, in order for you to win the winning thread, someone will have to post the 666 comment? a sign of something?

To those outside the game, I was lied to, I pressed a public case and now the certain members of the group after refusing to enforce the rules are talking to one another to prove some sort of point about my character. As is so often the case, the trial consists of dragging the victim through the mud without ever even addressing the perpetrator. Like I said, enforcement of such rules in impractical as Jimbozig predicted it would be. I was insufficiently cynical about my fellow man.

>=)

@Gopher, the collective was able to demonstrate.
We voted 6-1 that Germany was innocent. That seems like a collective to me.

So, I am trying again, anyone else want to be with me?

I'm in. I'm very saddened that last game had to go...I felt like I had a good game going...

I'll do round two, same settings?

Is the game filled?

Same settings:

Confirmed:
fasces349
LoveDove
tt612

@Ashelygirl: the game is not filled. You are welcome to join

I accept :-).

Confirmed:
1. fasces349
2. LoveDove
3. tt612
4. Ashelygirl

damnit fasces! you forgot me on the list again! just like last time! whyyyy!!!! : )

Ancient also said he would, but I will wait for him to post here. I would also prefer a different map, to be honest. I left FB diplomacy for VDip simply because I got tired of classic. Would you be open to considering some other variant? I'll obviously play classic if that is the consensus...

5. drano019

@fasces----just like OJ.

@Drano: you never posted saying you wanted in, you only posted saying it was a good game...

:P

Ahem, reread my post fasces. First two words are "I'm in" :)

lol

I am really sorry, I must have missed that part.

i saw my name?

Didn't know if you were confirmed to play again, Ancient. If so, you are #6.