17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Praed): Edmund or Clinton? |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Imagonnalose): meh.....lol |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Praed): I'm not sure about this version...looks like a straight race to the stalemate line. No fighting! |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Imagonnalose): perhaps that is the point ;) but if its a race to the stalemate line, then there is going t o be a lot of engame stuff to decide the winner :) |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Praed): I've never played Eng before... |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1901: (Praed): Ok...if not those two...sister? Mum? A crush? |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1901: nope...just a nice name lol |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1901: Hang on...you've had 2 moves to my 1! |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1901: It's ok..just read the rules for this variant. |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1901: no. thats how it starts. it gives an even start to england bc in its starting position, eng can only get 2 SCs |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1902: Grumble, grumble |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1904: I need a 2 min pause please! |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1904: take 5 ;) |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1904: Thanks! |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Autumn, 1904: no problem mate. |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Spring, 1905: ill be honest with you...im a little scared in this one... |
17 Feb 12 UTC | complete luck mate....good game. |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Lol..you shouldn't be..I'm several hundred games behind you. |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Yeah...I'm not sure the fact that the closest I've come to winning is when I'm half-drunk is a good thing. |
17 Feb 12 UTC | Sends the wrong message to my brain you know...lol |