Finished: 09 PM Thu 17 Feb 22 UTC
Layered classic public press only
1 day /phase
Pot: 35 D - Spring, 1911, Finished
1 excused NMR / regain after 5 turn(s) / extend always
Game drawn

< Return

Chat archive

1
...
Country:


10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: Let's start. Good luck to all!
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: Public Chat only... Interesting. So, France, I think it would be mutually beneficial to demilitarize the chanel (in both maps). Would you agree to such a proposal?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Russia, you can have Sweden and would you like a Silesia DMZ?

@France you can take Belgium, I can take Holland and we could bounce in Burgundy if you'd like.
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Germany do you mean both Belgiums and Hollands? I assume @Britain doesn't mind me taking Belgium too, given that a DMZ in English Channel limits British expansion there.
@Germany as for a bounce in Burgundy - how about bouncing in Burgundy 1 and a DMZ in Burgundy 2?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @France and @Germany
I'd like to take two out of the six Belgium, Holland and Denmark. Wpuld you two accept me raking Belgium 1 and Holland 2?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Britain given that you, me, and @Germany are very likely to end up in a conflict 2v1 in a foreseeable future (we just don't know the configuration yet), how are you going to defend Belgium 1 while maintaining a DMZ in the English Channel?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Britain how do you expect me to let you take Denmark or Holland, they both border my home centres so should they not belong to me?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: France also has a good point there, at least one of the Belgiums will be given to me or France.
@France the Burgundy stuff sounds good.
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: Actually can we DMZ both
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: My units in Belgium and Holland can be of use to you in the future. The question is tho whos use?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Russia are you okay with me taking both Norways, as you seem to get both Swedens?
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Germany: Silesia is great land for DMZ
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Britain from a purely military perspective, my own army in Belgium is more preferable for me than your fleet, not only because it's mine, but also because I can support Burgundy and Ruhr if necessary. I wouldn't mind you owning Holland, but apparently Germany doesn't agree with that.
10 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Germany let's do one bounce and one DMZ, there's more diplomatic flexibility when the two maps are not identical
11 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Britain Letting you take Holland would be a bit of a bad idea for me.

Alright then France, bounce 1, DMZ 2?
11 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @France okay, do you still agree to not go to the channel?
11 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: @Germany agree
@Britain agree
11 Jan 22 UTC Spring, 1901: Alright, I hope you uphold this promise, I will go for the Norways then. It would be beneficial to you as well to not interrupt me there.
11 Jan 22 UTC Autumn, 1901: Thank you France for upholding your promise.
11 Jan 22 UTC Autumn, 1901: Very funny @Italy, very funny
@Britain, @Germany, my army in Picardy 2 is ready to support one of you to Belgium 2.

1
...