10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: Let's start. Good luck to all! |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: Public Chat only... Interesting. So, France, I think it would be mutually beneficial to demilitarize the chanel (in both maps). Would you agree to such a proposal? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Russia, you can have Sweden and would you like a Silesia DMZ? @France you can take Belgium, I can take Holland and we could bounce in Burgundy if you'd like. |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany do you mean both Belgiums and Hollands? I assume @Britain doesn't mind me taking Belgium too, given that a DMZ in English Channel limits British expansion there. @Germany as for a bounce in Burgundy - how about bouncing in Burgundy 1 and a DMZ in Burgundy 2? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @France and @Germany I'd like to take two out of the six Belgium, Holland and Denmark. Wpuld you two accept me raking Belgium 1 and Holland 2? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Britain given that you, me, and @Germany are very likely to end up in a conflict 2v1 in a foreseeable future (we just don't know the configuration yet), how are you going to defend Belgium 1 while maintaining a DMZ in the English Channel? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Britain how do you expect me to let you take Denmark or Holland, they both border my home centres so should they not belong to me? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: France also has a good point there, at least one of the Belgiums will be given to me or France. @France the Burgundy stuff sounds good. |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: Actually can we DMZ both |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: My units in Belgium and Holland can be of use to you in the future. The question is tho whos use? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Russia are you okay with me taking both Norways, as you seem to get both Swedens? |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany: Silesia is great land for DMZ |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Britain from a purely military perspective, my own army in Belgium is more preferable for me than your fleet, not only because it's mine, but also because I can support Burgundy and Ruhr if necessary. I wouldn't mind you owning Holland, but apparently Germany doesn't agree with that. |
10 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany let's do one bounce and one DMZ, there's more diplomatic flexibility when the two maps are not identical |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Britain Letting you take Holland would be a bit of a bad idea for me. Alright then France, bounce 1, DMZ 2? |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @France okay, do you still agree to not go to the channel? |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany agree @Britain agree |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Spring, 1901: Alright, I hope you uphold this promise, I will go for the Norways then. It would be beneficial to you as well to not interrupt me there. |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Autumn, 1901: Thank you France for upholding your promise. |
11 Jan 22 UTC | Autumn, 1901: Very funny @Italy, very funny @Britain, @Germany, my army in Picardy 2 is ready to support one of you to Belgium 2. |