Welcome, Guest -
(Log on)
- Autumn, 1963, Finished
)
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Spring, 1960: (lambda.nrx): Hello again |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Spring, 1960: (svkrIs): well hope I'm not USSR this time... |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Spring, 1960: (lambda.nrx): If you are, you could try an even more exotic opening. Moskov to Caucasus maybe. (But that's probably bad) |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Spring, 1960: (svkrIs): as idiot as Shanghai - Saigon... |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Spring, 1960: (lambda.nrx): Yes |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | GameMaster: USSR voted for a Concede. If everyone (but one) votes concede the game will end and the player _not_ voting Concede will get all the points. Everybody else will get a defeat. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | My Spring 1963 move was terrible |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | a concede? |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | There is no way to win this anymore |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | still playable for me... |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | as my troops lockdown in some stupid positions |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | It doesn't look that bad now, but I would have to destroy two troops and you could build two additional ones. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | disband Nwy, Iran and then you'll take Shh/Egypt/Panama for sure, Leningrad possible Leningrad, WGE, and I don't think it's easy for me to get 3. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | the numbers of troops means nothing in this map - the positions they are counts. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | then it will turn to you have points, I have position, move on and on. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | At a difference of two, it's still possible to win with a good position, but with a difference of three you just have to play defensively and you'd win. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | I disagree but not worth arguing, thanks for the game. |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Thank you |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | At which point would you concede? Never? |
| 28 Oct 21 UTC | Not never, but I just consider this still playable. Also I just turned over a 3-point-difference game in the recent tournament. https://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=50507 |