01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1860: Ahh, we meet again on a new field of battle. Good luck! |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1860: I have never played this one, just saw it and thought "what the hell" |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1860: I've only played it 1v1 once, its fun but tends to get bogged down around Richmond and DC. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1860: and thus I have no idea on the real strategies of this one so I will be feeling my way - have you played it before? |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1861: Just once, but it was a crapshoot. The whole game is stalemating along Kentucky/WV/Chicago and building up armies while your fleets run around and pick up centers in Mexico and Canada. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1864: The Confederacy is terrible in this game! I'm practically limited to one build if I want to hold Richmond, although I'm not quite sure why that's needed. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1864: I think you have to hold Richm and DC both to win the game, don't you? |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1865: Doesn't look like thats implemented yet, according to the variant page. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1865: oh, wow did I misunderstand that, serves me right for "skimming"! |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1865: you are right, though ... boy have I wasted time on the whole Richmond thing then ... and you are getting fat on centers! |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1865: Haha, although holding both does make a lot of sense in this variant. That'll teach you. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1865: Damn, nice turn. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1866: that sucked, I should have just held about half of my units |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1867: shit I can't build |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1868: Rough. Could use a few too. |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1868: you just built 3!! |
01 May 12 UTC |
Spring, 1868: I was referring to you :) |
01 May 12 UTC |
Autumn, 1868: boy did I butcher job the simple support hold of Minneapolis |
01 May 12 UTC |
Nice game, that was a fun one. |
01 May 12 UTC |
that was a bear - my head is spinning ... good one though |